Miami served up yet one more bitter tablet for Ferrari followers, who as soon as once more needed to abdomen a lacklustre efficiency dressed up with post-race feedback from Frederic Vasseur that hardly mirrored actuality. “The chef,” because the Ferrari trustworthy have dubbed him, appears decided to maintain serving poorly ready dishes whereas persevering with to current them as connoisseur delicacies. However style—not like phrases—is sincere, and the target fact from the monitor doesn’t lie.
Driver administration at Ferrari: the same old mess, adequate for Fred Vasseur
The Staff Principal claimed the group’s dealing with of its drivers was “good.” But Lewis Hamilton remained caught behind Charles Leclerc for a number of laps after the pit cease, shedding round 1.5 seconds to Andrea Kimi Antonelli throughout a vital section of the race when his medium tyres have been at their finest. The swap ought to have occurred instantly—or higher but, been a part of the race technique from the beginning. The delayed name damage each drivers’ tempo and immediately affected their competitiveness within the last levels.
Even Lewis Hamilton himself, each over group radio and later with a cooler head, identified the flawed execution. Charles Leclerc, for his half, prevented talking a lot over the radio to stop his frustration from being broadcast reside. A lot for “every thing was good”—this was extra like groping at the hours of darkness whereas the stopwatch advised a really totally different story.
The automobile? SF-25, a damaged promise
In accordance with Fred Vasseur, Ferrari’s race tempo was consistent with Mercedes and Pink Bull. However actuality paints one other image: greater than 57 seconds behind the winner and over 20 seconds adrift of the highest Mercedes and Pink Bull. For about ten laps, the SF-25 seemed respectable. However the remainder of the race rapidly dispelled that phantasm. You possibly can’t decide a 57-lap race based mostly on one brief stint—particularly not within the closing laps, when others are managing tyres and gasoline.
In the meantime, Charles Leclerc continues to state that he’s extracting every thing he can from the automobile, and that with out actual updates, there’s no manner ahead. “We’re getting probably the most out of it,” he retains repeating—a sentiment in stark distinction with the phrases of Ferrari’s group principal, who insists on downplaying the difficulty and speaking about some legendary “untapped potential.”
When advertising and marketing drives the narrative
At this level, what we’re witnessing seems to be much less like a failed technical plan and extra like a rigorously crafted communications technique, the place picture issues greater than outcomes. Nobody dares admit that the venture has failed—sponsors should be reassured, and the subsequent spherical of merchandise should nonetheless be bought to loyal followers who all the time assist the crimson automobiles.
However true Ferrari followers, who follow the group even in laborious occasions, deserve honesty—not statements that haven’t any hyperlink to the info. The parable that Ferrari is near being the second-best group should finish. Persevering with to promote hopes which are repeatedly shattered by info not solely fails to ship outcomes—it drives away supporters who have been misled by daring predictions and triumphant declarations made initially of the season, when the outcomes have been nonetheless zero.
Purchase official Ferrari F1 merchandise!
Let different Scuderia Followers find out about us
