McLaren received the Constructors’ Championship, and Ferrari, in contrast, misplaced it. This occurred through the 2024 Method 1 racing season. The reason being fairly clear sadly, contemplating the Maranello workforce’s errors. We’ve got reiterated this exhaustively, we should admit, in a number of articles devoted to the Italian workforce for a lot of months now. The problem stays the identical and revolves across the incapacity of the technical workforce led by Italian aerodynamicist Enrico Cardile, the previous technical director of the Maranello squad, to provide efficient aerodynamic package deal. And by now it’s a well-know undeniable fact that the Spanish Grand Prix was sadly the start of the catastrophe that crippled the Prancing Horse.
The Italian facet launched a brand new model of the medium-to-high downforce rear wing. However an important innovation was undoubtedly the ground, an important macro-component for producing aerodynamic load. When such a component is launched on a automobile competing in an important class of motorsport, it requires efficient on-track validation. Certainly, it isn’t in any respect easy to instantly decide whether or not the research carried out on the manufacturing facility, between simulator and wind tunnel, have really resulted in a tangible enchancment. For that reason, on the Circuit de Catalunya in Barcelona, the decision remained undecided.
Nonetheless, between the Austrian Grand Prix and the race weekend in Nice Britain, the solutions got here loud and clear. The brand new ground of the SF-24 didn’t work as meant. It generated appreciable instability when it comes to dealing with, eliminating the characteristic of the Ferrari that drivers appreciated most: its predictability. There was important bouncing and, usually talking, nice issue in using the correct journey heights. On the Hungarian Grand Prix, a “fast repair” was launched by the Maranello workforce’s technicians and engineers, which was the truth is a preliminary modification to make this element extra manageable whereas ready for a completely new ground, which might solely arrive in Italy for the house race on the Monza circuit.
Within the meantime, six races the place the SF-24 showcased all its limitations. Aggressive situations by which Charles Leclerc and Carlos Sainz had been compelled into fixed adaptation, yielding no optimistic outcomes. Throughout this a part of the 2024 Method 1 season, Ferrari misplaced its probability to win the Constructors’ Championship. Moreover, contemplating Charles Leclerc’s remaining hole of 81 factors to Max Verstappen, the concept the Monegasque might have competed for the Drivers’ Championship shouldn’t be far-fetched in any respect. There’s additionally one other challenge weighing on the Constructors’ outcomes, the place the ultimate margin was a lot smaller, specifically might Ferrari have received the Constructors’ with out McLaren’s Mini DRS?
What we’re referring to is intently inked to the disputes relating to McLaren’s legality. This brings us again to the dialogue concerning the rear wing. A kind of “mini drag discount system,” with which the MCL38 might preserve a downforce stage much like Ferrari’s however get pleasure from a transparent benefit in high-speed sections. Basically, drag was diminished because of a selected aeroelasticity of the ingredient, which might barely open on straights even with the drag discount system closed. This benefit was estimated at a high velocity achieve of not less than 3 or 4 kilometers per hour, which is clearly not insignificant in any respect.
Inside this state of affairs, there are two interrelated points that increase issues and never only for Ferrari. The primary includes the FIA’s angle following Purple Bull’s report. To begin with, if the Milton Keynes workforce had not filed a grievance, the MCL38 would have continued utilizing the disputed wing till the tip of the 2024 Method 1 championship. This highlights the inadequacy of the legislative physique, which makes the principles however is totally incapable of imposing them. Furthermore, as soon as the questionable legality was established, the Worldwide Federation didn’t penalize McLaren.
As a substitute, it politely invited the Woking workforce to retire the particular element. Moreover, by its technical director, former Ferrari engineer Nicholas Tombazis, it acknowledged that sure previous instances couldn’t be verified and subsequently instantly closed the matter. Sweeping the problem beneath the rug, basically. That is the FIA’s strategy. Creating such a precedent is very dangerous in Method 1. Why? As a result of a workforce that goes unpunished units an instance for others, which, in flip, will really feel entitled to make use of borderline or outright unlawful options, realizing they’ll face no penalties.
Nonetheless, in our view, essentially the most critical matter issues the second challenge that surfaced with the modification to the technical laws for subsequent yr. The regulatory physique launched a change that appears tailored to forestall an analogous or an identical answer to that utilized by McLaren from being replicated. Beginning in 2025, the flap of the movable wing should adhere to the identical deformation restrictions as the remainder of the bodywork when the drag discount system is inactive. To be even clearer, the regulatory physique added a clause by way of Article 3.10.10.
There should be a compulsory minimal distance between the 2 parts of the rear wing when the drag discount system shouldn’t be lively. Throughout the wingspan, the rear-end profiles should preserve a minimal distance between 9.4 and 13 millimeters. This parameter shall be enforced when the system is inactive, with FIA inspections utilizing a calibrated spherical device to make sure full compliance earlier than official periods. At this level, a query arises and offers us a lot to consider relating to the matter.
Why does the FIA “ban” McLaren’s answer, thus deeming it unlawful, but through the championship selected to miss it and never penalize a workforce that derived clear advantages? Is that this the usual process? Can we discuss a skewed championship? Simply within the Azerbaijan Grand Prix on the Baku metropolis circuit, the place the MCL38’s “Mini DRS” made the distinction, if we subtract 7 factors from Oscar Piastri (who completed first) and add them to Charles Leclerc, second on the end, the 2 groups would have tied with 659 factors. Furthermore, Ferrari would have had another victory. However sadly, retroactive penalties don’t exist.
— see video above —
Purchase official Ferrari F1 merchandise!
Let different Scuderia Followers find out about us
